Perspective-taking Essay

derriere, 12 years old, sits anxiously on his desk, waiting for Ms fear to hand him the result of his math turn out. With hands in fervent prayer, he closes his eyes as Ms Terror lays the test paper on his table. A big red F screams to him the moment he opened his eyes. He has expected that grade because instead of reviewing for the test, he spent the night forgathering profits games with Aaron. His dilemma how can he get a good grade in next Fridays exam when Aaron is inviting him to play again? According to Magnus Linklater (2007), mates groups are a childs biggest influencers.This is undeniable as children believe their peers are the only ones who can understand them. tho adults should not underestimate their occupation solving abilities as they have a unique way of getting things done and answering their personal needs. Looking into Piagets cognitive development, we see that commode has upright entered the formal operational stage, wherein he develops the ability to thi nk about abstract concepts and discovers skills such as logical thought, deductive reasoning, and systematic planning (Van Wagner, 2007).With logic, washbasin chooses to study not only for his coming math test but also for all his other tests and sets aside internet games until weekend. He knows that doing so, he allow for get more than just a passing grade, and thus no more terror looks from Ms Terror as well as unrequested talks with Mom and Dad. Moreover, thinking abstractly, instead of relying on past experiences, John considers the possible consequences of agreeing to Aarons invitation. He would be reprimanded by Ms Terror or worse, she would call the attention of his parents.In addition, John chooses not to rely on trial-and-error methods of doing things, as he did when he was younger or in earliest stages of Piagets cognitive development (Van Wagner, 2007). He now has the ability to solve his dilemma in a systematic manner, thus he quickly comes up with a plan for him not to get another dreaded F. He reads his lessons few days before the test so he can play games with Aaron in his free time or review his lesson the night before the test and just play on weekends, whichever way he is comfortable with.But Johns interaction with his peers, Aaron in particular, should not be discouraged, as Piaget pointed out that a childs peer interaction is not just a major source of his or her cognitive development but his or her social development as well, specifically in role-taking and empathy (cited in Oden, 1987). John regards Aaron as his best friend, thus sustaining their friendship allows John to know his own self and his range of social interaction skills. Furthermore, since the two boys have passed the stage wherein they carry on just physical activities like childhood games, and they are now capable of sharing materials, being kind or helpful (Oden, 1987), and perceiving their friendship as financial backing individuality and mutuality, John either invi tes Aaron to review their lessons together before playing games or asks Aaron to postpone their leisure activity until the test is done so that severally can review on his own and eventually perform better in the test.The theory of moral development by psychologist Kohlberg, who drew inspiration from Piagets cognitive development, can also help answer Johns dilemma. John frivol aways into consideration the expectations of his family, as he tries to maintain, support, and justify that studying hard for the test is the right thing to do, in accordance to the conventional level of Kohlbergs theory. Specifically, he resorts to being a good boy by reviewing for the test because he knows that doing so will please Ms Terror and Mom and Dad.Johns behavior is judged by his intention, which is both good and important since he subject matter well (Kohlberg, 1971) for himself, for Ms Terror, for Mom and Dad, and even for society at large. John could solve his dilemma in various perspectives, which directly or indirectly take its root from Piagets cognitive theory. This only shows that students like John can solve their own dilemmas in their own respective ways. It is normal for them to falter and take a crap mistakes because through these, they get to learn, grow, and develop. Now, John sits comfortably on his desk, excited to see his grade on the math test. B it reads.