How globalized world issues could be helped? Essay

The large number want to topple the regime was the anti-government graffito painted by a group of Syrian children in the Daraa city in March 2011. These children were arrested and tormented by the local credentials authorities (Diehl, 2012 7). This act eventu each(prenominal)y led to an anti-governmental uprising due to the extortionate reaction of a community over childrens mistreatment after incarceration by the local security authorities. The uprising demanded the release of children, justice, freedom as well as likenity for only people. At the core, these pacifistic demonstrations were considered to be against the sectarian and family dictatorship because the political government agency was mainly held by the Alawite elite (Diehl, 2012). In retort to these demonstrations, the Syrian government planned to enforce security forces for the protestors to suppress them. This gave rise to the tensions dramatically and tensions spread in the entire country. This rebellion furthe r turned into a full-fledged civil war between the promiscuous Syrian army and the Syrian regime (Thompson, 2016). The main allegation that the Syrian regime associated with the protestors was that they were Islamic Al- foundations extremist terrorist gangs who were nourishmented and funded by the various countries such as Turkey, Qatar, the kingdom of Saudi Arabia as well as the get together States of America by which they try to seek peace with Israel (Sommier, 2014). Similarly, the same Syrian regime was present in the front line with Israel who was certifyed by Russia, Iran as well as China (?) (Fisher, 2012). Ever since this happened, the situation and complexity of the war has been thickened with different actors entering from the knowledge base-wide, portional or Syrian side and due to which Syria was turned into a proxy battlefield (Wimmen and Asseburg, 2012)The death toll as preserve and presented by the Syrian center for policy research approximately totaled at 4 70,000 as a result of ongoing conflict till February 2016. Due to the intensification and spread of fomenting, a dire humanitarian crisis was discernible since 4.8 million people tried to scan refuge abroad and 6.1 million people were internally displaced as per the records of UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. It has besides been reported by the Syrian Ne dickensrk for Human Rights that since 2011, more than 117,000 people endure been any(prenominal) disappeared or detained by the governmental forces. In the detention, ill-treatment and torture are two rampant things that have also resulted in the death of thousands of people in detention. In addition to all the crisis events going on, ISIS (Islamic State) made more complications by the widespread and systematic violations. This was achieved by ISIS through targeting civilians with artillery, kidnappings, executions, using children as soldiers, and torture (Human Rights Watch, 2016).One of the biggest ch allenges that the international relations could face was ab let on how globalized world issues (?) could be jocked. With the help of deep research and fascinating drawing of the international relations, the concept has been explored in the book of International Relations Theories (Where is with the pee-pee of the book) by Steve Smith (Smith, Kurki and Dunne, 2016 11) Why you take away the original call downment here?. Based on this, in that location are various currents that can be evident in the international relations theories with a particular proposition focus on the Syrian conflict. Constructivism and realism are two entirely different things are they take up different approaches.Compared to a normative approach, realism takes up an explanatory approach for the study of international relations. Realism is based on the following 3 core competencies1. States are owned by expedience and self- interests and are the unitary and rational actors2. States are considered to be th e central actors of international arena WHY you delete statism? (Dunne and Schmidt, 2017 109)3. Anarchy is visible in the international system (Ikenberry and Parsi, 2009)Anarchy can be described as a system that comprises of various independent states who do non have any particular capability over them (Mearsheimer, 2001 30). This ultimately guarantees extract as well as security through material capabilities and self- help (Waltz, 1979 213)A pessimistic outlook of persistent danger and threat is possessed by the realists, based on which it mentioned that all the state actors are driven by the requirement of greater actor and dominance for trim down the elimination of actors potential and create a balance of power (Gellman, 1988). Within an anarchical system, the type of competition and insecurity inherent, such type of concentrations automatically adapt to the balancing responses by either by internal balancing where material capabilities are made up or through outside(a) b alancing where capabilities are aggregated. This provides evidence that alliances are not so much appreciated in foothold of realism and shared ideas and values, however, it does through raison detat and self- interests (Morgenthau, 1948).In realism, it should be noted that the states are not equal and are placed in a hierarchical order as per the amount of power they have. In an anarchical system, the only way to defend and survive is to use the army power (Slaughter, 2011). Some of the self-involved passions are given primary emphasis by the realists, especially that the presence of political action with an fell in it as mentioned by Donnelly in 2000 (Morgenthau, 1946 203). Due to this condition, politics turn into such a fight back where the shadow of war WHERE IS is something that is considered to be ever- present (Aron, 1970 36) mainly due to the irreconcilable aspirations of the states (Carr, 1946).According to this, every state would try to obtain as much power as possi ble. But in case on that point is an imbalance of power, the likelihood of war becomes high primarily because the stronger state may attack the weaker state without any loss to itself. This idea about power not only encompasses around the soldiers power, rather it also encompasses around the economic power. This means that states whose economies are growing help the states to gain more power this is because power in the international system is demonstrated through economic strength. Therefore, the attention of realists is focused on thriftiness of a state as it is related to its power (Mearsheimer, 2016).As per the realists, who consider that non- governmental organizations lack military power, they are not able to compete with the international systems. This means that the role played by United Nations is limited (Dunne and Schmidt, 2017 106). This is deemed important because the main actors in international relations are worried about gaining higher(prenominal) benefits than the separates have gained.Strategies like mutual mistrust, selfishness, power- seeking, recklessness, as well as survival securing, are considered to be sure-footed for producing structures like security dilemmas, international self- help systems, political communities, unrestricted politics of national interests, the permanent potentiality of war and violence and many others.The above discussed theoretical formulation of realism can also be applied to the conflict of Syria being studied in this paper. This conflict of Syria can be regarded as a struggle of gaining power among foreign actors or states who contrasted in their interests but were involved in the conflict. For example, Russia, China, United States of America, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and others who approached Syrian war, all of them had their personal benefits as well as predicted results in mind to achieve.The power of United States of America in the international system was tried to be restricted by the support of al- Assa d government by China, Russia, and Iran with the militia- cum- party of al-Jihad. This was achieved through the formation of an alliance with Syria as well as vetoing kerfuffle by United Nations Security Council. This helped them to restrict the US from gaining any sort of advantage over unification Africa or Middle East (Yan, 2013).Ever since the conflict started in Syria, Assad was supported by Russia by all means including in terms of weapons, technical advisors as well as by sending military advisors. Eventually, in 2015, September 15, a direct military intervention was opted by Russia despite the fact that it aimed to fight ISIS but it was mainly meant to target opponents of Assad (Spaulding, 2015). Since the cold war ended, Russias identity as one of the world powers has greatly reduced and as per the framework of zero-sum competition for power provided by Dunne and Schmidt (Dunne and Schmidt, 2017 110), the only way out for Russia is to avoid definite exclusion from the are a while balancing Washingtons sway as well. Moscows projection of power in the Eastern Mediterranean was also dependent upon the survival of Assad so that the power could be specifically projected to geopolitical ambitions and interests of Russia (Litsas, 2017). This further poses a big challenge about whether Russia can be sure about its position and safety of its economic interests or not (Freedman, 2010).On the other hand and on an equal basis, there was a breeze of uneasiness in between American government and Iran because the American government was able to make an influence in the region and in return was upsetting the regional power as mentioned in Sick et al. (2008 1) WHY you remove the reference and put the name of the writer out WHERE IS the original statement (it is clear that Iran is now a centerpiece of American Policy (Sick et al., 2008 1) that Iran was the centerpiece of attraction for the American policy. Due to this, Iranians took greater defensive measures as the y continued to internally balance and build their nuclear capabilities. Considering the military standing between Syria and Iran that is only meant to assure the borders and state to balance the potential threats that may arise from Turkey, Israel, American ally of the Sunni Gulf States and others (Laub, 2017). Iran is still considered to have a stronger strategic position due to the fact that Syria would be at their hands with the loyalty of Hezbollah in Lebanon and Palestine at one site. This is also one of the justifications that have been used by Iran to support its involvement in ideological motive because Allah has ordered all Muslims to defend and protect each other from all sort of outside threats, as per Imam Khomeini. This is another reason with which Iran supports its view of protecting and back up Palestinians because they are not recognized by the West and are repressed by Israel (Segall, 2012).